About
I'm a PhD student in Queen Mary University of London. From Monday to Friday (and sometimes Saturday and Sunday), I am in the lab working some biochemistry experiments.Warning
If you like my photos, please do not steal them, that means, make sure you don't alter them and make it look like yours, do not acknowledge me as the owner and make profit out of them. This only applies to my pictures which are watermarked.Comments
Got a burning question? ASKLinks
Follow me in TWITTER.Following
Twittering
Looking for something?
Wish to help me out?
I'll be very grateful if you could spare any amount for me to get better photography equipment.My twitter stream was flooded with how awesome The Hunger Games is. Not too mention, many of them will watch the movie again. (And more depressing is - the movie premiere affects the ratings of Fringe)
****** There will be spoilers from here onwards. Most likely will spoil both the movie and the first book ******
I watched it tonight. And when Katniss finally came back to District 12. I was left shocked and so disappointed.
Here are the reasons.
1. The problem is, the book is not intended as PG-12. That alone affected the movie. The film clip shown in District 12 does not have impact. The opening scene of the battle should be a blood bath - and I don’t even see any drop of blood. C’mon. It should be violent. And I don’t feel anything at all.
2. The Hunger Games is an introductory book and therefore, it opens up this big whole concept (and world). The problem is, the movie is not a perfect visualisation venue for this book. There is no way you can do great characterisation with a movie under 3 hours. And therefore, you have a half-baked character building of Haymitch and Gale. While the movie wrongly overplayed President Snow, when he’s almost invisible in the first book.
3. In my perspective, the Hunger Games plays on a lot of internal battles of Katniss. The problem with the movie is they were substituted with so much non-sense, which includes the computerised game room - which never existed, by the way, in the book. I would have wanted to see more of Katniss contemplating and having internal battles - her begging Haymitch for water, her confusion of Peeta’s feelings whether is real or not, her trying to figure out the strategy of Peeta, her love for Gale and Prim, and so on.
4. This is connected to 2. Another problem with the movie is that there’s way too many things happened, that cannot be fitted in the movie and thus makes a bit confusing. One of my friends got no clue what is the prize of winning the game (well, except for being alive).
5. Gale is an integral part of Katniss’ story. Especially in the first book. The problem with the movie they downplay the character of Gale which makes it seemingly that it is a one-way feeling (Gale to Katniss), but in fact, it is more of a mutual thing. Katniss likes Gale. Gale likes Katniss. And she is reluctant of the baker boy Peeta, because she was confused whether he is just playing it or not. While alone in the wood, Katniss remembered Gale - sadly, there’s no flashback of her and Gale in the movie.
6. Katniss never left Rue that way. One of the emotional point of the book is Katniss holding on to Rue while Rue is being taken away. We never even see the dead tributes being taken away. In addition, District 11 was supposed to give a bread to Katniss as a gift… which never happened. Instead a rebellion.
7. It was a long ride back home. Visiting each district. Sadly, this never happened.
*** I am not a fan of the first book. I think the second book is so much better. In fact, the first book for me is so predictable. But the movie just happened to be so disappointing… ***
Observer 4x13
Observer. 4x12.
Walter. Alt-Olivia. Hooking up. Any Olivia-Walter ship?
In the Entrada episode, Walter calling Fauxlivia’s action as “vagenda” a reference to her sleeping with Peter. In the Making Angels “Previously on Fringe”, he said “I fell…” suggesting that in the No-Peter timeline… Fauxlivia could have slept (or at least) seduce Walter.
The episode is filled with almost love quarrel between Fauxlivia and Walter. Begins with Walter calling her a Viper and Mata Hari… with a reference to a food time (lunchtime). This suggests that Fauxlivia uses his stomach to get to him. Walter returned Fauxlivia’s items… which consist of clothes. Why are they even in his lab? His lab is HIS HOME… remember Walter stayed in the lab for years? It is a proof that she also stayed in the lab… sleep in the lab. Fauxlivia finally pokes a joke on Walter - flirting with me? Walter must be a “good boy” for Fauxlivia… did Frank found out that…………….. anyway. That’s all. What do you think?
it was a bit of a trek to the lab… (Taken with instagram)